Korean & Code-Specialized LLM Lineup

Minerva

Validated 0.2, from-scratch 1.0, and Apollo — a Korean & code-specialized LLM evolving on three tracks

Azwell AI develops Korean & code-specialized LLMs on three parallel tracks. Minerva 0.2, built on an open-source 80B MoE base, has completed validation of our full training and evaluation pipeline (measured benchmark results published); on top of those assets we are developing Minerva 1.0, a from-scratch foundation model; and in parallel we are training Apollo, a flagship that combines NVIDIA Nemotron Super 120B with Korean-language training and coding RL. Beyond fine-tuning to full foundation models — internalizing the entire stack with our own technology.

Model Lineup — Three Tracks in Parallel

Minerva 0.2 — Validated

Open-source 80B MoE base + Korean CPT/SFT + our in-house Harness inference — training/evaluation pipeline fully validated with measured benchmark results published

Minerva 1.0 — In Development

A from-scratch pretrained foundation model — tokenizer, architecture, and data pipeline all designed in-house from a blank slate

Apollo — In Training

NVIDIA Nemotron Super 120B base + Korean-specialized training + coding RL post-training — a flagship aimed at top-tier performance

The three tracks are a staged technology-internalization strategy. With 0.2 we battle-tested data curation, training infrastructure, and our evaluation harness; on that validated pipeline we build the fully-controlled from-scratch 1.0; and in parallel, Apollo secures immediate top-tier performance by combining reinforcement learning with the strongest open base available (Nemotron Super 120B). Risk is divided across tracks — technology assets are shared between them.

Minerva 0.2 — A Validated Starting Point

Training + Harness Combined

Korean-language training combined with Harness inference techniques, with gains verified through real measurements — +6 points confirmed on Korean general knowledge

MoE Inference Efficiency

Only about 3B of the 80B total parameters activate at inference time — 8B-model speed with 80B-model quality

Single-GPU Operation

About 45GB with INT4 quantization — inference on a single H100/A100, under Apache 2.0 with no commercial-use restrictions

Minerva 0.2 Benchmark Results — Measured

BenchmarkMinerva v0.2
KMMLU (Korean knowledge)66
HAE-RAE (Korean culture & common sense)64
HumanEval (code)85
MBPP (basic code)78
HumanEval-X-ko ★ (Korean code)70
KLUE-NLI (Korean reasoning)89

Domestic positioning — Rather than chasing the 'No.1 on general-knowledge benchmarks' race, Minerva 0.2 is a specialized model focused on real-world accuracy and realistic operating cost for handling code in Korean. It is strong on code (HumanEval 85) and Korean reasoning (KLUE-NLI 89), and — as an 80B-class model that runs on a single GPU (INT4) under a commercially unrestricted Apache 2.0 license — it offers the most practical alternative for Korean companies building in-house Korean coding assistants and RAG without large infrastructure. The general-knowledge dimension is reinforced through the from-scratch 1.0 and flagship Apollo tracks.

The Harness Methodology — Our In-House Inference Technique That Boosts Quality Without Additional Training

01

Plan

Analyze the problem and establish a solution strategy first

02

Draft

Generate an initial response according to the established plan

03

Critique

The model itself inspects the draft for errors and omissions

04

Revise

Refine the response by incorporating the critique

05

Verify

Check the final response for consistency and accuracy before output

This technique enforces a step-by-step reasoning flow on the same model to raise response quality, and can be applied with roughly 200 lines of code — no additional model training required. Minerva 0.2's real-world validation confirmed a +6-point gain on Korean general knowledge — the first measured case in Korea to combine Korean-language training with the Harness approach. The same evaluation harness is reused for quality validation of 1.0 and Apollo.

Minerva 0.2 — Inference Advantages

MoE Architectural Efficiency

Each inference computes only ~3B relevant expert parameters out of 80B (about 4% of the compute) — dramatically faster responses than a dense 80B model

Speed vs Quality Balance

Inference speed on par with an 8B model, with 10x the trained capacity (80B) — securing both speed and response-quality potential

Long Context 32K+

Coding-specialized architecture (Gated DeltaNet + MoE) handles 32K+ tokens — differentiated from general chat models capped at 4K

Korean × Coding Combined

Best suited for scenarios that write code from Korean-language documents — superior code understanding and generation accuracy versus other Korean models

Memory Requirements and Operating Efficiency

ConfigurationMemory FootprintSingle-GPU Inference
Original (16-bit)160 GBNot possible (exceeds a single 80GB H100)
INT8 quantization~80 GBPossible (single H100)
INT4 quantization~45 GBPossible (single H100/A100)

Performance loss from quantization is 1–2% — barely perceptible to users — and conversion is automated with standard tools (AWQ, GPTQ). On the cloud, a single server with one NVIDIA A100 80GB (about $2/hour, ≈ $1,400/month or KRW 1.92M) is enough to run Minerva 80B INT4.

Use Scenarios

B2B Cloud API Service

Optimal — realistic operating costs with single-GPU serving

In-House Korean Coding Assistant

Optimal — Korean domain knowledge on a coding-specialized base

Korean RAG & Document Analysis Systems

Well suited — 32K+ long-context processing

Edge & Mobile Embedded

Not supported — a separate ~0.8B distilled version is under consideration for future release

Minerva 1.0 — From-Scratch Foundation Model (In Development)

Designed From a Blank Slate

Tokenizer, model architecture, and training recipe designed in-house from scratch — internalizing foundation-model construction beyond open-source fine-tuning

Korean & Code-Centric Data Pipeline

The entire pretraining corpus pipeline — collection, cleaning, deduplication, quality filtering — built in-house

Inheriting 0.2's Validated Assets

The training infrastructure and evaluation harness battle-tested on 0.2 apply directly — structurally reducing from-scratch risk

Full-Stack Control

Complete control over data provenance, licensing, and model behavior — the foundation for customization in regulated industries like finance and the public sector

Apollo — Flagship on Nemotron Super 120B (In Training)

A Top-Tier Open Base

NVIDIA Nemotron Super 120B — starting from among the strongest reasoning performance of any open base available today

Korean-Specialized Training

CPT and SFT on Korean knowledge, culture, and domain data — directly closing the Korean-language gap of global base models

Coding RL Post-Training

Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) such as test passes and execution results — optimized for code that actually runs, not just human preference

Why 'Apollo'

Following Minerva, goddess of wisdom — Apollo, god of reason, logic, and foresight: the name of a flagship aimed at both Korean and code

Roadmap — From Validation to Foundation

01

Done · Minerva 0.2

Open-source 80B MoE + Korean CPT/SFT/DPO + Harness — measured benchmark results published

02

In Training · Apollo

Nemotron Super 120B + Korean training + coding RL — securing flagship performance

03

In Development · Minerva 1.0

From-scratch pretraining — a fully in-house foundation model

04

Expansion · Multimodal

Vision-language expansion under review once a VLM base is secured

Training pipeline: CPT (Korean continued pretraining) → SFT (domain supervised fine-tuning) → DPO (preference alignment) → RL (reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards, Apollo). Minerva 0.2's measured benchmark results are published, and model weights, code, and evaluation results are released as open source on HuggingFace and GitHub (license: Apache 2.0).

Contact Sales